SFGTV2: San Francisco Government Television
102
102
Dec 6, 2012
12/12
by
SFGTV2
tv
eye 102
favorite 0
quote 0
commissioner sugaya. >> yes. i would like to have the commission give consideration to perhaps inserting the january thursday, but substituting another thursday somewhere in that long string of meetings that we have in between february and may and that could be the end of march for example or something like that just to give us a break in there. >> we always have the ability of scheduling more meetings and canceling them or postponing -- >> yeah, it's probably easier to cancel meetings than reschedule them. >> right. >> because we just send out a cancellation notice and that's it. >> but if it's on the schedule the staff is going to go ahead and start scheduling things for it so that's the problem. >> well, if we know well in advance, yes. >> commissioner wu. >> i could supportive of the desire to add in the 31st on january and then maybe take off the last of march. to respond to commissioner antonini i think it's important to take the planning commission appointment serious but also it limits who can be on the p
commissioner sugaya. >> yes. i would like to have the commission give consideration to perhaps inserting the january thursday, but substituting another thursday somewhere in that long string of meetings that we have in between february and may and that could be the end of march for example or something like that just to give us a break in there. >> we always have the ability of scheduling more meetings and canceling them or postponing -- >> yeah, it's probably easier to cancel...
SFGTV2: San Francisco Government Television
96
96
Dec 6, 2012
12/12
by
SFGTV2
tv
eye 96
favorite 0
quote 0
commissioner sugaya. >> did we ever have the option of having a city email box? >> i don't think it would be too difficult to set up for you. >> but in the beginning we were never -- >> yeah, we had the phone numbers but i don't think email was ever offered up. >> we could certainly establish one. could think about that because it's cluttering my other -- >> the issue again is everybody has your other email. >> it will just get forwarded. that's all. >> commissioner borden. >> not to get you off topic but i created a separate account that my commission stuff comes to and i have four email addresses and that way i don't have -- just a thought. >> next item. >> okay commissioners. that will place us under item six which is consideration of adoption of your 2013 planning commission hearing schedule. you have received a draft schedule in your packets last week to consider, but i would like to also bring to your attention some holidays that are not noted for your consideration. in february chinese new years is on february 10 which is a sunday. shouldn't impact your he
commissioner sugaya. >> did we ever have the option of having a city email box? >> i don't think it would be too difficult to set up for you. >> but in the beginning we were never -- >> yeah, we had the phone numbers but i don't think email was ever offered up. >> we could certainly establish one. could think about that because it's cluttering my other -- >> the issue again is everybody has your other email. >> it will just get forwarded. that's all....
SFGTV2: San Francisco Government Television
56
56
Dec 6, 2012
12/12
by
SFGTV2
tv
eye 56
favorite 0
quote 0
. >> commissioner sugaya. >> we don't have a requirement for car share, do we? >> yeah we do have a requirement for car share. if it's less than 50 years you don't need a space but over 50 i think it's one and over a hundred i think it's two, so there is a minimum amount. this would basically set a maximum amount. >> but they're not in the spaces required under the code? >> no. they do not count -- your required car share spaces don't count against your max parking allotment. >> okay. thank you. >> commissioner antonini. >> just clarification. you have of course the principally permitted residential parking that varies from project to project and gain by cu and some places there are requirements for car share but there is a maximum on the car share as it now exists in most instances? >> the maximum is -- let's say you're required to have one space and you can have that and doesn't take away from the maximum amount but if you max out the parking it can't add car share spaces so this allows to you add in addition to that and not count against you on a voluntary ba
. >> commissioner sugaya. >> we don't have a requirement for car share, do we? >> yeah we do have a requirement for car share. if it's less than 50 years you don't need a space but over 50 i think it's one and over a hundred i think it's two, so there is a minimum amount. this would basically set a maximum amount. >> but they're not in the spaces required under the code? >> no. they do not count -- your required car share spaces don't count against your max parking...